Print

News >> Browse Articles >> Controversies & Scandals

News >> Browse Articles >> Seasonal News & Tips

+14

Academic Freedom vs. Adult Content

Academic Freedom vs. Adult Content

Teachers have academic rights but students do, too.

Elizabeth Hoyt

December 04, 2012

Freedom of speech is nothing new when it comes to controversy. Freedom of speech in academia? Been there, done that. Freedom of speech in academia claimed by a faculty member in order to defend the pornography she showed her class? Now we’re listening.

According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, Jammie Price, a professor of sociology at Appalachian State University, was suspended after showing a documentary about pornography in class with explicit sexual scenes that her students were less than prepared for.

Certainly, Price did have a right to discuss and use the documentary film for instructional purposes. It followed the curriculum in the sociology course and the film is, in fact, commonly viewed within sociology courses. This is agreed upon by the chancellor and the faculty committee assigned to review Price’s case.

The key mistake Price made was that she should have considered the rights of her students also. This would entail warning them about the graphic content the film contained rather than just pressing play.

Price, a tenured professor at the university, also failed to consider or be sensitive to the fact that some scenes may have been offensive to some of her students whereas a warning about the content could have eased or prevented the entire situation from exploding in such as dramatic way.

Though the film was the straw that broke the camel’s back, so to speak, Price had several other complaints on her record that were factored into her suspension decision. In addition to the pornography film complaint, Price received complaints regarding her comments about hostility towards school athletes along with school athletes receiving special privileges and sexual assault charges against school athletes–many of which came from the athletes themselves (who were later transferred to different courses so that they no longer had to deal with Price). Price maintains that she did not comment on all athletes, she just criticized a particular investigation.

Other complaints involving Price’s comments and discussions involving race, ethnicity and athletics involving higher education were on record as well. Price alleges that the students simply did not understand her comments, which were remarking colleges pushing minority students into athletic programs rather than academics.

The other complaints, however, were mainly disregarded by the reviewing faculty’s findings. The report defended Price, saying that any discussion of race and ethnicity would likely hit home with many students and that allegations of Price being racist were completely false.

The report also found that, as a professor of sociology, Price had a right to discuss such issues, as they are all legitimate topics for any sociology course–even when the topic include criticism of the university.

As for the criticism of college athletes and their special privileges, the report defended Price again, saying that the athletes do, in fact, receive special privileges. The fact that they were transferred out of her course so as not to deal with her rather that sit down and discuss it (as she has originally requested) was a testament to that fact in and of itself.

Yes, more sensitivity could have been administered but, in the end, her faculty review committee consisting of her peers found that Price’s teachings were all legitimate and that the university had violated her academic freedom. In an interesting turn of events, the university’s chancellor disagreed with the findings and claimed the panel’s findings regarding the poor judgment in the way she chose to show the film to the students in her class was conflicting with the evidence shown.

Chancellor Kenneth E. Peacock announced he was rejecting the faculty review and ordered Price to undergo a two-year professional teaching development plan in addition to seeking prior approval of any video material used in her courses. Price believes she is being punished for exercising her free speech and, if she doesn’t comply, will risk dismissal from the university.

The chancellor has drawn his line in the sand, but Price ultimately believes her academic freedom and freedom of speech is being squandered. Whether or not her job is a price she’s willing to pay is yet to be seen.


Do you think Price’s punishment was fair? Why or why not?


+14
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    jumanisu

    almost 2 years ago

    20 comments

    If you think William`s story is incredible,, a month-back my auntiez girl-friend basically earnt $6635 putting in a thirteen hour week from there apartment and the're classmate's mom`s neighbour done this for 7-months and brought home over $6635 parttime at There laptop. the instructions on this web-site... http://www.Cloud65.com

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Deon

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    @Flowerhorn: Do you have any proof of the pornography study?

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    dbcheme

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    @Flowerhorn - Roll Tide

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    lori917

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    These are college students not pre school. Grow up.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Flowerhorn

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    How ironic. Pornography has been shown to change the brain, destroy the male bonding hormone and increase violent behavior. With courses like this, it is little wonder that human trafficking is increasing and out-of-control behavior like Kansas City Chief's Belcher's murder/suicide, Coach Sandusky's sexual abuse and other horrific stories are filling the news. The purpose of academics is supposed to be to educate our children for the benefit of the student and the good of society. "Academic freedom" has now become an excuse for the so-called "educated" elite to impose their often bizarre agenda or viewpoint on a trusting and captive audience. Why is it legal in America to do whatever one wants to, to someone else's child in the name of academic freedom or freedom of speech, despite the fact that it could cause harm to them, immediate or long term? Who gave the schools this right?

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    PhillipEG

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    Punishment was unfair.
    I didn't see where the students did not have a choice to leave, or where it says they asked her to stop playing the film. The chancellor is also rejecting a faculty review and taking a dictatorial approach to what's happening; rather than listen a collective group of her peers, the chancellor enforces what him himself sees best.
    I don't think the point of the study as to shock as much as it was to expose students to an aspect of human sociology; the premise of the class.

  • Pic2_max50

    copelin85

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    Punishment was fair. There are many (not all) sociology professors who believe that their goal in life is to expose students to anything that will shock/offend them. The class should be about the content of society and the findings therein not about forcing individuals to disregard their own beliefs and masking it as teaching. How incredible would it be if a religious person teaching a religious class forced students to burn crosses or take part in other nonviolent behavior just because it cuts against the grain?

    Present students with the information and let them decide for themselves and don't intentionally push them to accept your own beliefs and values as their own.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    63butlee

    almost 2 years ago

    2 comments

    The only thing she did wrong was not warn her students. She is a tenured professor, she has been there long enough to know what is going on and proper procedure. There is no playing favorites here by having the faculty support her, it is the chancellor in the wrong.

Recent Activity

Photo_user_blank_big
fernandoh received the quiz result of "The Perfect Handshake", about 1 hour ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
fernandoh received the quiz result of "You are probably a Networking Expert", about 1 hour ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
em19 received the quiz result of "You’re a Connector", about 8 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
em19 gave a thumbs up to The Quiz "What Kind of Girlfriend Are You?", about 8 hours ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
em19 received the quiz result of "Steady Supporter", about 8 hours ago.